THE CONCEPTS OF TASK-BASED AND INTERACTIVE LEARNING IN TEACHING ENGLISH: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS

Main Article Content

Mehriniso Aggali qizi Karibova

Abstract

Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) and interactive learning have emerged as two of the most theoretically coherent and pedagogically productive frameworks in contemporary English language education. Grounded in communicative language teaching principles and underpinned by Vygotskian sociocultural theory, these approaches reconceptualise the EFL classroom as a space for authentic meaning-making, collaborative inquiry, and socially mediated skill development. This article examines the theoretical origins, defining characteristics, and pedagogical implications of task-based and interactive learning with particular reference to English writing instruction in secondary school contexts. Drawing on foundational research in second language acquisition [Long, 1985; Ellis, 2003], cooperative learning [Johnson & Johnson, 1994; Kagan, 1994], and process-oriented writing pedagogy [Harmer, 2004; Hyland, 2003], the article argues that the principled integration of these frameworks offers a theoretically robust and empirically substantiated basis for improving learners' written communicative competence. Practical implications are discussed with reference to the educational reform priorities of the Republic of Uzbekistan, including the National Programme for the Development of Public Education 2022–2026 and the Uzbekistan–2030 Strategy.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

1. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford University Press.

2. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. Longman.

3. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.

4. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge University Press.

5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (4th ed.). SAGE.

6. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

7. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445

8. Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Education.

9. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford University Press.

10. Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

11. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

12. Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. Kagan Cooperative Learning.

13. Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE.

14. Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.

15. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Multilingual Matters.

16. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

17. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

18. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.

19. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

20. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

21. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.

22. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.004

23. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.

24. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

25. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.